Showing posts with label Memphis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Memphis. Show all posts

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Top 25


*previous rank in parentheses

1) Florida 27-2 (1)
top five wins: Kansas; Memphis(n); Missouri; @ Tennessee; @Kentucky
losses: @Wisconsin; @Connecticut

2) Arizona 27-2 (2)
top five wins: @San Diego State; Duke(n); @Michigan; @UCLA; Arizona State
losses: @California; @Arizona State

3) Wichita State 31-0 (4)
top five wins: Brigham Young(n); @Saint Louis; Tennessee; Indiana State; @Indiana State
losses: none

4) Syracuse 26-3 (3)
top five wins: Villanova; North Carolina; Pittsburgh; Duke; @Pittsburgh
losses: Boston College; @Duke; @Virginia

5) Duke 23-6 (5)
top five wins: Michigan; UCLA(n); Virginia; @Pittsburgh; Syracuse
losses: Kansas(n); Arizona(n); @Notre Dame; @Clemson; @Syracuse; @North Carolina

6) Wisconsin 24-5 (8)
top five wins: Florida; Saint Louis(n); @Virginia; Michigan State; @Michigan
losses: @Indiana; Michigan; @Minnesota; Northwestern; Ohio State

7) Kansas 22-7 (6)
top five wins: Duke(n); New Mexico(n); @Iowa State; Iowa State; Oklahoma
losses: Villanova(n); @Colorado; @Florida; San Diego State; @Texas; @Kansas State; @Oklahoma State

8) Michigan 21-7 (9)
top five wins: @Wisconsin; Iowa; @Michigan State; @Ohio State; Michigan State
losses: @Iowa State; Charlotte(n); @Duke; Arizona; @Indiana; @Iowa; Wisconsin

9) Virginia 25-5 (15)
top five wins: Southern Methodist(n); North Carolina; @Pittsburgh; @Clemson; Syracuse
losses: Virginia Commonwealth; Wisconsin; @Green Bay; @Tennessee; @Duke

10) North Carolina 22-7 (16)
top five wins: Louisville(n); @Michigan State; Kentucky; Pittsburgh; Duke
losses: Belmont; @UAB; Texas; @Wake Forest; Miami; @Syracuse; @Virginia

11) Louisville 24-5 (7)
top five wins: Southern Miss; Western Kentucky; Southern Methodist; @Connecticut; @Cincinnati
losses: North Carolina(n); @Kentucky; Memphis; Cincinnati; @Memphis

12) San Diego State 23-3 (13)
top five wins: Creighton(n); Marquette(n); @Kansas; UNLV; @Boise State
losses: Arizona; @Wyoming; @New Mexico

13) Villanova 26-3 (19)
top five wins: Kansas(n); Iowa(n); @St. Joseph's; @St. John's; @Providence
losses: @Syracuse; Creighton; @Creighton

14) Cincinnati 24-5 (11)
top five wins: Pittsburgh(n); Southern Methodist; @Memphis; @Louisville; Connecticut
losses: @New Mexico; Xavier(n); @Southern Methodist; Louisville; @Connecticut

15) Iowa State 22-6 (14)
top five wins: Michigan; Iowa; Oklahoma; @Oklahoma State; Texas
losses: @Oklahoma; Kansas; @Texas; @Kansas; @West Virginia; @Kansas State

16) Michigan State 22-7 (10)
top five wins: Kentucky(n); Oklahoma(n); @Texas; Ohio State; @Iowa
losses: North Carolina; Michigan; Georgetown(n); @Wisconsin; Nebraska; @Michigan; Illinois

17) Connecticut 23-6 (23)
top five wins: Florida; Harvard; @Memphis; Memphis; Cincinnati
losses: Stanford; @Houston; @Southern Methodist; Louisville; @Cincinnati; Southern Methodist

18) Saint Louis 25-4 (12)
top five wins: Indiana State; Richmond; @ St. Joseph's; Virginia Commonwealth; George Washington
losses: Wisconsin(n); Wichita State; Duquesne; @Virginia Commonwealth

19) UCLA 22-7 (22)
top five wins: Arizona State; @Colorado; Stanford; California; @California
losses: @Missouri; Duke(n); Arizona; @Utah; @Oregon State; @Stanford; Oregon

20) New Mexico 23-5 (24)
top five wins: Cincinnati; Marquette(n); Boise State; @UNLV; San Diego State
losses: Massachusetts(n); Kansas(n); New Mexico State; UNLV; @Boise State

21) Creighton 23-5 (18)
top five wins: @St. Joseph's; Arizona State(n); California; @Villanova; Villanova
losses: San Diego State(n); George Washington(n); @Providence; @St. John's; @Xavier

22) Oklahoma 21-8 (25)
top five wins: @Texas; Iowa State; @Oklahoma State; Kansas State; Texas
losses: Michigan State(n); Louisiana Tech; Kansas; @Kansas State; @Iowa State; @West Virginia; Texas Tech; @Kansas

23) Memphis 22-7 (NR)
top five wins: LSU(n); Oklahoma State(n); @Louisville; Gonzaga; Louisville
losses: @Oklahoma State; Florida(n); Cincinnati; Connecticut; @Southern Methodist; @Connecticut; @Houston

24) Iowa 20-9 (20)
top five wins: Xavier(n); Nebraska; @Ohio State; Minnesota; Michigan
losses: Villanova(n); @Iowa State; @Wisconsin; @Michigan; Michigan State; Ohio State; Wisconsin; @Minnesota; @Indiana

25) Kentucky 21-8 (17)
top five wins: Providence(n); Louisville; Tennessee; @Missouri; LSU
losses: Michigan State(n); Baylor(n); @North Carolina; @Arkansas; @LSU; Florida; Arkansas; @South Carolina

IN: Memphis
OUT: Ohio State

Thursday, January 26, 2012

CBB Uniforms (1988-89 to Present): 8 Seeds

RBP has been ranking the top 64 uniforms from the 1988-89 season to the present. For more on that process, read the introduction to the original post. The 8 seeds:

32) San Diego State (Kawhi Leonard): While I didn't give the Aztecs bonus points for their shoe game, please enjoy the various Jordan models pictured below.





31) Memphis (Anfernee Hardaway): Back when Penny was balling in Bluff City and the school was still known as Memphis State, the blue unis with the gray trim were hard to top.




30) St. John's (Moe Harkless):Big fan of the black alternate and even bigger fan of the font.




29) Kentucky (Brandon Knight):As Kentucky has a history of terrible uniform choices (denim Converse unis, Apex cat scratch shorts, and soon to be debuted Nike Platinum gear come to mind), I am fearful the Wildcats will drop their current duds, which continue to grow on me.



Thursday, December 22, 2011

CBB Uniforms (1988-89 to Present): 16 Seeds

What's that? Oh, you wanted me to rate the top 64 college basketball uniforms from the past 23 seasons? Well, you're in luck, because that's what's getting ready to happen - in 16 installments. I began watching college basketball during the 1988-89 season as a 7-year old. That season ended with Michigan topping Seton Hall in the National Championship game. Given my viewing lifetime, this list only takes into consideration uniforms worn from the 1988-89 season up to the present. For the most part, the ratings are about design, color scheme, and uniqueness. I am not penalizing pre-Fab Five era uniforms for their embarrassing short shorts. Similarly, I am not penalizing current uniforms for their embarrassing capri pants. I am also ignoring the fact that water marks exist on the back of uniforms. Hopefully, that is a fad that will disappear quickly. I should also note that the same team can appear on this list more than once. In fact, 9 teams appear on the list twice, and two schools make three appearances. In other words, 11 programs make up 25 of the 64 uniforms on the list. There are no hard and fast rules. These are just my opinions. That being said, there are a few guidelines I'm trying to follow. I've also tried my best to take my rooting interests out of the equation. Uniforms that have reached iconic status get a boost in the rankings. Similarly, uniforms that were truly revolutionary - in terms of fit or design - get a boost. Where only small modifications were made to a program's uniform over time, I have included the most appealing uniform from that series. However, where significant changes have been made, multiple uniforms from the same program are eligible for inclusion. I am taking into consideration third and fourth color alternates and alternate designs. However, I am not taking into consideration throwback uniforms that were part of a team's uniform rotation, unless that throwback served as the team's primary uniform. As it is difficult to pinpoint exactly the years in which some of these uniforms were worn, I have referenced a particular uniform by school and player in an attempt to jog your memory and to give you a rough idea of the time the uniform was worn. In some cases, the player pictured is not the player named as a reference point; it's simply the best picture I could find of the uniform in question. Without further ado, RBP's 16 seeds:

64) Memphis (Tyreke Evans)
Memphis currently wears uniforms that are almost identical to these, save for the addition of stripes on the shoulders, down the sides, and on the shorts.




63) Clemson (Trevor Booker)
Clemson's otherwise average uniforms make the cut on the strength of their purple alternates.




62) Utah (David Foster)
Like the throwback jersey look but not a fan of the shorts, which read "U - US - MUSS", a reference to the team motto (the MUSS being the Utah student section).




61) Kansas State (Jacob Pullen)
The white and black versions are fantastic, but the purple and gray models drag the Wildcats down.



Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Titans, Tigers, and Purple Aces.

Detroit wore the uniforms shown above for the Dick Vitale court dedication on Monday night. These are the most awful, ill-fitting uniforms I've ever seen. Here's a photo gallery. Despite Detroit's sartorial sin, the Titans topped St. John's 69-63. Plus, the jerseys are being auctioned off, and a portion of the proceeds will benefit the V Foundation. Ugly jerseys for a very good cause.

Memphis is also rocking throwbacks this season. These unis honor the Tigers' national runner-up finish to UCLA during the 1972-73 season. This is how you do throwbacks.


More Memphis.


And now for the jersey/t-shirt we need to get back on the court as soon as possible.


As a child, I was confused by Evansville's choice to wear short sleeves. Now I wish the Purple Aces would drop the tanks in favor of the tees.


*The player pictured in the photo above is Clint Keown. He was a three-sport star at Evansville Memorial (alma mater of Louisville Cardinal Kyle Kuric, my old roommate Prince Fennis Ismael, baseball great Don Mattingly, and my grandfather) and is now a professional poker player. I don't know anything about poker, but here's a link to a web page with a photo of Keown wearing a trucker cap at a poker table and a story about how he won money off a man suffering from food poisoning.

**I should probably add that Evansville lost to North Carolina tonight by a score of 97-48. The game made me sad. However, the Aces knocked off Butler in overtime in the season-opener in the brand-new Ford Center in downtown Evansville. Go Aces!

Saturday, November 27, 2010

2010-11 Outlook: Mid-Majors




Top 10 Non-BCS Conference Teams

1. Gonzaga - David Stockton, son of Gonzaga and NBA great John Stockton, is a walk-on point guard for the Zags.

2. Brigham Young - Jimmer Fredette may get the press, but backcourt mate Jackson Emery is perhaps just as important to the Cougars' success.

3. Temple - Fran Dunphy continues to work wonders for a program that only recently appeared to be in sharp decline.

4. Memphis - Josh Pastner has no problem recruiting, but can he coach?

5. Murray State - Reigning OVC champs return 8 of top 10 scorers.

6. San Diego State - Most talent that Steve Fisher has had since his days with the Fab 5.

7. Richmond - 38-year old head coach Chris Mooney is going to have offers from some big-time programs very soon.

8. Butler - Shelvin Mack is a beast, but the Bulldogs are going to miss Gordon Hayward even more than the pundits seem to think.

9. UNLV - The perennially competitive Runnin' Rebels will take third in an extremely talented Mountain West Conference.

10. Old Dominion - Experienced Monarchs play physical, suffocating defense.

All Mid-Major Team

Kevin Anderson, Richmond, sr, guard
Jimmer Fredette, Brigham Young, sr, guard
Shelvin Mack, Butler, jr, guard
Kawhi Leonard, San Diego State, soph, forward
Lavoy Allen, Temple, sr, forward

Player of the Year

Kawhi Leonard, San Diego State - Long athlete who hits the glass, has an excellent motor, and finds ways to score.

Top Freshman

Joe Jackson, Memphis - Self-proclaimed "King of Memphis" is not lacking for confidence and is key to Tigers playing Top 25 basketball.

Top Defender

Jay Threatt, Delaware State - Ballhawk averaged an NCAA-leading 2.8 steals per contest last season as a sophomore.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The Contenders (11 of Them)









Tier 1

Louisville

Why They Can Win It All: One of the deepest (and healthiest) teams in America. Four Cardinals – Edgar Sosa, Jerry Smith, Andre McGee, and Preston Knowles – get significant run in the backcourt. Terrence Williams, Earl Clark, Samardo Samuels, and Terrence Jennings form a talented frontcourt rotation. And Rick Pitino isn't afraid to go deeper into bench if his top eight aren't producing. As the Cards' pressing defense is their biggest strength, this depth is integral to their success.

Why They Can't: While they have a pair of point forwards in T-Will and E5 (two of the most creative nicknames ever), the Cards' lack of a true point guard will be their ultimate demise. Sosa is a two-guard in a point guard's body, and McGee and Knowles are ineffective on the offensive end at best. History tells us that past champions have almost always featured a capable point guard that protects the ball and dictates pace. Oh, and the Cards also have trouble shooting free throws.

North Carolina

Why They Can Win It All:
The Tar Heels are the most talented team in the country. Even with their injury woes, UNC is adequately deep and starts four All-American-type talents (Ty Lawson, Wayne Ellington, Danny Green, and Tyler Hansbrough). Deon Thompson isn't too bad either. It will be hard for anyone to match Roy Williams' squad in terms of sheer firepower.

Why They Can't:
Ty Lawson's toe and a lack of defensive intensity. Ol' Roy's squad can make a deep run without Lawson, but there's no way they win a championship without him. The Tar Heels are much better defenders than they are given credit for, but the lapses in concentration on the defensive end are worrisome. The tournament is not the time to suddenly develop the intestinal fortitude to play forty minutes of defense.

Pittsburgh

Why They Can Win It All: The Panthers are the most physical team in college basketball. They beat up their opponents with rough play in the post and lockdown defense on the perimeter. Every single member of Jamie Dixon's squad defends, and, with the exception of their recent loss to Providence, Pitt plays with purpose every night. They've been in tourney mode all season.

Why They Can't:
When DeJuan Blair gets in foul trouble, this team really struggles. And with Pitt's physical style of play, there's a good chance Blair finds himself on the bench at some point. This may seem like digging for a reason to discount Pitt's chances, but Blair sets the tone for the Panthers and the team's identity is inextricably tied to his play. When Blair is out, this team looks lost.

Tier 2

Connecticut

Why They Can Win It All: Their frontline of Hasheem Thabeet, Jeff Adrien, and Stanley Robinson is second to none. Adrien is an absolute warrior. Robinson, the Huskies' 6-9 small forward is a matchup nightmare. And Thabeet is the most dominating force in college basketball. (Yes, even more dominating than Blake Griffin.) The tournament is all about quick turnaround in terms of preparation. And while everyone tweaks their defensive strategies to counter the opposition's offensive strengths, Thabeet requires opponents to change their offensive game plan – not an easy task this late in the season.

Why They Can't: The bench (or more accurately, the lack thereof). With Jerome Dyson's injury, the Huskies are limited to a seven-man rotation. I'm a firm believer that even an eight-man rotation is dangerously thin for a team trying to win six straight games in quick succession. Moreover, Dyson was the Huskies most dangerous perimeter scoring threat. Freshman Kemba Walker and senior Craig Austrie are going to have to increase their offensive output.

Michigan State


Why They Can Win It All:
Rebounding and defense. It's become almost cliché to talk about the toughness of a Tom Izzo-coached team, but 08-09 Spartans fit the description. And while no one expects the champion to emerge from the Big Ten – a conference where the basketball is looking less and less like the game the rest of the country is playing – the Spartans, unlike their conference foes, actually have the firepower to light up the scoreboard.

Why They Can't: The Spartans lack a dynamic scorer capable of creating his own shot. Kalin Lucas is a facilitator, but he's not going to drop 20 on the opposition. Raymar Morgan has been disappointing and isn't that effective with the ball in his hands. Based on senior Goran Suton's numbers, his offensive development hit a ceiling during his junior campaign. And while Durrell Summers may eventually become that player for Tom Izzo, he's not nearly consistent enough to fill that void at this point in his career.

Oklahoma

Why They Can Win It All: Perhaps the country's most complete starting five. The Sooners' lineup features the best player in the country and arguably the top freshman. And, importantly, the two compliment one another. The attention Blake Griffin attracts in the post allows super-frosh Willie Warren to operate more freely on the perimeter. Austin Johnson, the Sooners' 6-4 senior point guard, is a crafty playmaker who excels at finding his teammates in scoring position without dominating the ball. Tyler Griffin is a banger and an excellent interior passer. And Tony Crocker shoots the three and wears a long-sleeved shirt under his jersey.

Why They Can't: A very inexperienced bench. Jeff Capel has done a decent job of patiently expanding his rotation, but it would be a stretch to call the Sooner reserves tournament-ready. Cade Davis is a solid contributer, but Juan Pattillo is the only impact player Capel can turn to in a pinch.

Wake Forest

Why They Can Win It All: No team has more upside than the Demon Deacons. NBA-caliber athletes litter Dino Guadio's roster. In fact, Jeff Teague, Al-Farouq Aminu, and James Johnson give Wake three lottery-caliber talents. L.D. Williams and Chas McFarland, while not as gifted as the headliners, also create matchup problems with their size and strength.

Why They Can't: It is highly unusual that a team that didn't even get invited to the dance one year leaves belle of the ball the next. Guadio's top three players are sophomores or younger, and that rarely equates to postseason success.

Tier 3

Clemson


Why They Can Win It All: Perhaps no squad in America epitomizes the concept of team more than the Clemson Tigers. These guys seem to genuinely enjoy playing with one another, and I don't think there's a destructive ego among them. Moreover, each Tiger has a clearly defined role. Power forward Trevor Booker is the first option on offense (not to mention one of the best defenders in the ACC). And I must say – it's refreshing to a see a team that voluntarily gets its big man touches on almost every possession. No arm-twisting. No barking from the sideline. No ill-advised threes while the post talent has his man pinned on the block. Rather, the Tigers look to the post like it's second nature. Swingman K.C. Rivers guards the opponent's best perimeter scorer and slashes to the hoop. Terrence Oglesby provides the long-range game. Raymond Sykes is the Tigers' hype man. He's active on the glass and cleans up his teammates' misfires. Demontez Stitt is the glue guy who does the dirty work.

Why They Can't:
This team truly has reached its potential. Clemson is a good team but not a great one. They lack a dynamic scorer, and they don't have a point guard that can impose his will on the pace of the game. Just not enough talent to do much damage in March.

Duke

Why They Can Win It All:
The Blue Devils are extremely talented and very deep at the 1-4 spots with Nolan Smith, Greg Paulus, Elliot Williams, Jon Scheyer, Gerald Henderson, and Kyle Singler. Equally effective in the half-court set or in transition, scoring is not a problem for these marksmen. And in terms of perimeter defense, Purdue may be their only competition. It would also be difficult to find a more intelligent group of basketball players. And while some of them are limited athletically, a Smith-Williams-Henderson-Singler lineup is going to hold its own against anyone.

Why They Can't:
Absolutely no post presence. Singler lines up at the four, but he plays like a three. He's all finesse and angles. And while Singler can block the occasional shot, post scorers with size and explosion wreak havoc on Duke's vanilla frontline defenders. And on offense, Coach K has no one to pound the ball into when the shots aren't falling.

Memphis

Why They Can Win It All:
It's time we stop doubting John Calipari's program and start realizing that Memphis puts high-quality product on the floor every year. The names may be different, but the results are the same. The nation's most talented freshman piloting a Memphis squad that is angling for a one seed. Sound familiar? And like Derrick Rose last year, Tyreke Evans is far from a one-man show. Senior Antonio Anderson and Robert Dozier are back after briefly flirting with turning pro after last year's runner-up finish. Shawn Taggart starts at the five, and he's actually more reliable and versatile on offense than his predecessor, Joey Dorsey. Doneal Mack may not be Chris Douglas-Roberts, but he's proven to be an instinctual scorer in his own right.

Why They Can't: Beating up on the wasteland that is Conference-USA basketball doesn't prepare a team for March Madness. Memphis may be confident, but most teams would be emboldened beating up on the Marshalls and Southern Misses of the world.

Villanova

Why They Can Win It All:
Jay Wright has four guys capable of creating their own shot – combo guards Scottie Reynolds and Corey Fisher, wing Corey Stokes, and power forward Dante Cunningham. In terms of sheer offensive versatility, few teams can match Villanova. College basketball is a guard's game, and Villanova has three that can take over a game. Plus, their best player may be Cunningham, giving them a true post threat.

Why They Can't:
Scoring has never been the problem for Jay Wright's teams, and, even though this year's version of Wildcats' guard-heavy lineup is better on the defensive end than in years past, it's still nowhere near national champion-caliber defense. Sure, the Big East is tough, but why would anyone expect a team that could finish no better than fourth in their own conference to win the National Championship?

Monday, March 9, 2009

Perfect Storm Brewing in Memphis












With all eyes focused on Championship Week, Joe Lunardi, and the impending March Madness, recruiting has taken something of a backseat in the general roundball consciousness. Well, we may want to redirect our gazes (even if only briefly) to the world of blue chip recruits, AAU tournaments, and Sonny Vaccaro-type peddlers of fortune. Developments with the potential to shake the college basketball landscape are taking place in southwestern Tennessee.

On November 18, Xavier Henry, a 6-6 210-pounder rated as the third best player in the 2009 high school class and the nation's top two-guard, signed on as just the latest of John Calipari's high-profile, highly-skilled recruits. In doing so, Henry follows in the footsteps of Dajuan Wagner, Derrick Rose, and most recently, Tyreke Evans. One-and-dones (or probable one-and-dones) who selected the friendly confines of Conference-USA and Calipari's free-wheeling, improvisational dribble-drive offense to showcase their lucrative talents during a mandatory pit stop on their way to the Promised Land.

Yesterday, DeMarcus Cousins, a 6-9 250-pound native of Mobile, Alabama, decided that he would also spend a year in Memphis. Cousins is considered the second best player in class of 2009 and is widely regarded as the best power forward and post player in the country. So, if you're keeping count, that means Calipari has wrapped up two of the top three recruits from this year's graduating class. Cousins originally said he would attend UAB. However, after UAB refused Cousins' request for an escape clause that would allow Cousins to get out of his letter of intent if head coach Mike Davis should leave or be fired, he reopened his recruiting.

The final piece of the puzzle is Raleigh Word of God Christian Academy point guard John Wall. Wall, the number one player in all of high school basketball is still weighing his college options, and Memphis is on his short list. Rumor has it that Wall will reveal his intentions at the McDonald's All-American game.